Enhance v0.6.1 testing documentation
- Expand TESTING.md with comprehensive test coverage details - Document server, WASM, and shared crate test suites - Highlight critical security and parity tests - Improve testing philosophy and contributor guidance - Record current 89-test validation baseline
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
3679e6808b
commit
c7873b429d
1 file changed
+179
-150
+179
-150
@@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# ChronoSeal Testing Strategy and Suite
|
||||
# ChronoSeal Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the testing strategy for ChronoSeal and summarizes the test coverage included in v0.6.1.
|
||||
ChronoSeal maintains a rigorous, security-first test suite focused on cryptographic correctness, deterministic server ↔ WASM parity, mutation engine integrity, replay resistance, tampering detection, behavioral validation, and storage reliability.
|
||||
|
||||
ChronoSeal is a security-focused system. Testing therefore prioritizes cryptographic correctness, deterministic execution, protocol integrity, and resistance to replay or tampering rather than simple line coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
As of v0.6.1, the ChronoSeal workspace contains:
|
||||
As of **v0.6.1**, the project contains **89 passing tests** across the server, WASM, and shared protocol crates.
|
||||
|
||||
| Crate | Tests |
|
||||
| ------------------- | -----: |
|
||||
@@ -15,73 +11,67 @@ As of v0.6.1, the ChronoSeal workspace contains:
|
||||
| `shared` | 35 |
|
||||
| **Total** | **89** |
|
||||
|
||||
All tests pass successfully on the reference development environment.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Philosophy
|
||||
## Test Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
ChronoSeal testing focuses on:
|
||||
ChronoSeal testing prioritizes:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Cryptographic correctness
|
||||
2. Deterministic server ↔ WASM parity
|
||||
3. Replay and tampering resistance
|
||||
4. Mutation engine integrity
|
||||
5. Negative-path validation
|
||||
6. Storage reliability
|
||||
7. Performance regression detection
|
||||
* **Security invariants** over raw coverage metrics
|
||||
* **Deterministic parity** between server and browser WASM runtimes
|
||||
* **Negative-path testing** (tampering, replay, malformed input, edge cases)
|
||||
* **Fuzz-style and randomized testing** for mutation logic
|
||||
* **Performance regression detection**
|
||||
* **Long-term protocol stability**
|
||||
|
||||
Particular emphasis is placed on ensuring that browser-side WASM execution produces identical results to server-side validation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Server Test Coverage (`chronoseal-server`)
|
||||
# Test Categories
|
||||
|
||||
The server crate contains 30 tests covering configuration, runtime initialization, session lifecycle management, heartbeat validation, rate limiting, and behavioral trust checks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration
|
||||
## 1. Configuration & CLI
|
||||
|
||||
Configuration tests verify:
|
||||
|
||||
* database type parsing
|
||||
* TOML configuration loading
|
||||
* default value handling
|
||||
* command-line override behavior
|
||||
* Database backend selection
|
||||
* TOML configuration parsing
|
||||
* Command-line override behavior
|
||||
* Default configuration values
|
||||
* Runtime initialization logic
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
Supported backends include:
|
||||
|
||||
* `sqlite-in-memory`
|
||||
* `sqlite-in-disk`
|
||||
* `valkey`
|
||||
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_apply_run_args_overrides_db_type
|
||||
test_default_db_type_is_sqlite_in_memory
|
||||
test_toml_parses_db_type_kebab_case
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Runtime Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
Backend initialization tests verify:
|
||||
|
||||
* SQLite in-memory mode
|
||||
* SQLite disk-backed mode
|
||||
* Valkey compatibility mode
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_init_db_pool_sqlite_in_memory
|
||||
test_init_db_pool_sqlite_in_disk
|
||||
test_init_db_pool_valkey_compat_mode
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Lifecycle and Security
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Session Lifecycle & Verification
|
||||
|
||||
Session tests validate:
|
||||
|
||||
* public key validation
|
||||
* session expiration
|
||||
* replay attack prevention
|
||||
* mutation step enforcement
|
||||
* commitment verification
|
||||
* long-running deterministic parity
|
||||
* Session creation
|
||||
* Public key validation
|
||||
* Expiration handling
|
||||
* Replay attack prevention
|
||||
* Mutation step enforcement
|
||||
* Commitment verification
|
||||
* Long-running deterministic parity
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_create_session_rejects_invalid_public_key_length
|
||||
@@ -90,18 +80,50 @@ test_replay_attack_is_rejected
|
||||
test_mutation_step_mismatch_is_rejected
|
||||
test_mutation_commitment_tamper_is_rejected
|
||||
test_session_lifecycle_and_verification
|
||||
test_repeated_simulation_keeps_server_and_client_commitments_equal
|
||||
test_deterministic_server_client_parity_across_many_heartbeats
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Heartbeat Validation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Heartbeat tests verify:
|
||||
## 3. Mutation Engine (Core Focus)
|
||||
|
||||
* successful state advancement
|
||||
* silent rejection behavior
|
||||
* rate limiting
|
||||
The Synthetic Gene Mutation Engine is one of the most security-critical components in ChronoSeal.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
Testing focuses on:
|
||||
|
||||
* Deterministic server/client parity
|
||||
* Mutation order execution
|
||||
* Gene state integrity
|
||||
* Preview → Commit → Discard lifecycle
|
||||
* Randomized mutation programs
|
||||
* Edge-case validation
|
||||
* Performance regression detection
|
||||
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_server_client_parity_across_random_orders
|
||||
test_generate_order_is_deterministic_for_seeded_rng
|
||||
test_invalid_positions_wrap_deterministically
|
||||
test_mutation_chain
|
||||
test_fuzz_style_random_program_bytes_do_not_diverge
|
||||
test_performance_smoke_mutation_execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Heartbeat Handler
|
||||
|
||||
Heartbeat validation tests verify:
|
||||
|
||||
* Successful state advancement
|
||||
* Silent rejection behavior
|
||||
* Commitment validation
|
||||
* Rate limiting
|
||||
* Next-state mutation generation
|
||||
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_handler_success_returns_next_mutation_fields
|
||||
@@ -109,17 +131,20 @@ test_handler_tampered_commitment_is_silent_failure
|
||||
test_handler_rate_limit_returns_no_mutation_data
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Behavioral Trust Validation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Trust checks verify:
|
||||
## 5. Trust & Behavioral Validation
|
||||
|
||||
* minimum mouse activity
|
||||
* minimum distance traveled
|
||||
* pause detection
|
||||
* speed thresholds
|
||||
* optional activity requirements
|
||||
Behavioral validation tests verify:
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
* Minimum mouse activity
|
||||
* Minimum movement distance
|
||||
* Pause detection
|
||||
* Speed thresholds
|
||||
* Optional activity requirements
|
||||
* Fingerprint-related validation paths
|
||||
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_validate_mouse_success
|
||||
@@ -127,26 +152,31 @@ test_validate_mouse_insufficient_events
|
||||
test_validate_mouse_insufficient_distance
|
||||
test_validate_mouse_too_fast
|
||||
test_validate_mouse_no_pauses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Rate Limiting
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_rate_limiter
|
||||
test_rate_limiter_eviction
|
||||
test_validate_mouse_require_activity_toggle
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WASM Test Coverage (`chronoseal-wasm`)
|
||||
## 6. Storage Layer
|
||||
|
||||
The WASM crate contains 24 tests covering both the virtual machine and browser-side mutation lifecycle.
|
||||
Storage tests verify:
|
||||
|
||||
## Virtual Machine
|
||||
* SQLite in-memory operation
|
||||
* SQLite disk-backed operation
|
||||
* Valkey compatibility mode
|
||||
* Session CRUD behavior
|
||||
* Expiration cleanup
|
||||
* Runtime statistics reporting
|
||||
|
||||
Opcode correctness is validated for:
|
||||
These tests ensure storage implementations remain interchangeable without affecting protocol behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. VM Core
|
||||
|
||||
The VM core is tested extensively across both WASM and shared crates.
|
||||
|
||||
Coverage includes:
|
||||
|
||||
* ADD
|
||||
* SUB
|
||||
@@ -161,11 +191,13 @@ Opcode correctness is validated for:
|
||||
|
||||
Edge cases include:
|
||||
|
||||
* stack underflow
|
||||
* truncated instructions
|
||||
* wrapping arithmetic
|
||||
* Stack underflow
|
||||
* Truncated instructions
|
||||
* Unknown opcodes
|
||||
* Wrapping arithmetic
|
||||
* Invalid instruction streams
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_add
|
||||
@@ -177,33 +209,44 @@ test_hash
|
||||
test_underflow_binary
|
||||
test_underflow_unary
|
||||
test_incomplete_push
|
||||
test_rejects_unknown_opcode
|
||||
test_rejects_truncated_instruction
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Browser Mutation Lifecycle
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The browser runtime tests:
|
||||
# Server Test Coverage (`chronoseal-server`)
|
||||
|
||||
* gene initialization
|
||||
* mutation preview
|
||||
* mutation commit
|
||||
* mutation discard
|
||||
* commitment parity
|
||||
The server crate currently contains **30 tests** covering:
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
* Configuration
|
||||
* Runtime initialization
|
||||
* Session management
|
||||
* Heartbeat validation
|
||||
* Rate limiting
|
||||
* Trust validation
|
||||
|
||||
The server tests focus heavily on protocol enforcement and security validation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WASM Test Coverage (`chronoseal-wasm`)
|
||||
|
||||
The WASM crate currently contains **24 tests** covering:
|
||||
|
||||
* VM execution
|
||||
* Browser-side mutation lifecycle
|
||||
* Gene initialization
|
||||
* Mutation preview
|
||||
* Mutation commit/discard behavior
|
||||
* Deterministic parity with shared logic
|
||||
|
||||
Example tests:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_init_gene_state_success
|
||||
test_init_gene_state_rejects_zero
|
||||
test_preview_commitment_matches_shared_engine
|
||||
test_commit_applies_preview
|
||||
test_discard_preview_keeps_committed_state
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Deterministic Parity
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_table_driven_parity_across_many_generated_orders
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -213,21 +256,11 @@ These tests ensure browser-generated commitments remain consistent with server e
|
||||
|
||||
# Shared Crate Coverage (`shared`)
|
||||
|
||||
The shared crate contains 35 tests and represents the core security-critical logic of ChronoSeal.
|
||||
The shared crate currently contains **35 tests** and represents the core protocol implementation used by both server and browser runtimes.
|
||||
|
||||
This crate receives the heaviest protocol-focused testing because it is shared by both server and WASM runtimes.
|
||||
Coverage includes:
|
||||
|
||||
## Synthetic Gene Engine
|
||||
|
||||
Gene state tests validate:
|
||||
|
||||
* initialization rules
|
||||
* environment encoding
|
||||
* environment decoding
|
||||
* commitment generation
|
||||
* quantity management
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
### Synthetic Gene Engine
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_new_state_with_default_size
|
||||
@@ -237,30 +270,18 @@ test_encode_decode_environment_roundtrip
|
||||
test_table_driven_randomized_environment_roundtrip
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Mutation Engine
|
||||
|
||||
Mutation engine tests verify:
|
||||
|
||||
* deterministic execution
|
||||
* mutation chains
|
||||
* opcode correctness
|
||||
* stack handling
|
||||
* instruction validation
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
### Mutation Engine
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_mutation_chain
|
||||
test_opcode_insert
|
||||
test_opcode_delete
|
||||
test_opcode_mutate_point
|
||||
test_opcode_apply_mutagen
|
||||
test_opcode_finalize_gene_hash
|
||||
test_mutation_chain
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation and Hardening
|
||||
|
||||
Defensive validation tests include:
|
||||
### Validation & Hardening
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_rejects_stack_underflow
|
||||
@@ -269,9 +290,7 @@ test_rejects_unknown_opcode
|
||||
test_zero_length_gene_is_rejected
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Deterministic Server ↔ WASM Parity
|
||||
|
||||
These are among the most important tests in the project:
|
||||
### Deterministic Parity
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_server_client_parity_across_random_orders
|
||||
@@ -279,17 +298,13 @@ test_generate_order_is_deterministic_for_seeded_rng
|
||||
test_invalid_positions_wrap_deterministically
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Fuzz and Regression Testing
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
### Fuzz & Regression Testing
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_fuzz_style_random_program_bytes_do_not_diverge
|
||||
test_performance_smoke_mutation_execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These tests help detect behavioral divergence and unintended performance regressions.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Running the Test Suite
|
||||
@@ -303,12 +318,12 @@ cargo test --workspace
|
||||
Run individual crates:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cargo test -p chronoseal-server
|
||||
cargo test -p chronoseal-wasm
|
||||
cargo test -p shared
|
||||
cargo test -p chronoseal-wasm
|
||||
cargo test -p chronoseal-server
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Show test output:
|
||||
Display test output:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cargo test -- --nocapture
|
||||
@@ -318,7 +333,7 @@ cargo test -- --nocapture
|
||||
|
||||
# Critical Security Tests
|
||||
|
||||
The following tests protect core ChronoSeal security guarantees:
|
||||
The following tests protect ChronoSeal's core protocol guarantees and should be treated as **release-blocking** if they fail:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
test_mutation_commitment_tamper_is_rejected
|
||||
@@ -329,7 +344,19 @@ test_deterministic_server_client_parity_across_many_heartbeats
|
||||
test_fuzz_style_random_program_bytes_do_not_diverge
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Any failure in these areas should be treated as a release-blocking issue.
|
||||
These tests directly validate resistance to replay attacks, protocol divergence, mutation tampering, and commitment forgery.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Contributing New Tests
|
||||
|
||||
When adding new functionality:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Prefer placing protocol logic tests in `shared/`
|
||||
2. Ensure server ↔ WASM parity is validated
|
||||
3. Include negative-path test cases
|
||||
4. Add randomized testing where appropriate
|
||||
5. Update this document when introducing major new categories
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -337,11 +364,11 @@ Any failure in these areas should be treated as a release-blocking issue.
|
||||
|
||||
Planned enhancements include:
|
||||
|
||||
* property-based testing using `proptest`
|
||||
* browser-driven end-to-end integration tests
|
||||
* Valkey concurrency testing
|
||||
* automated benchmark execution
|
||||
* expanded mutation-engine fuzzing
|
||||
* Property-based testing using `proptest`
|
||||
* Browser-driven end-to-end integration tests
|
||||
* Valkey concurrency and failover testing
|
||||
* Automated benchmark execution in CI
|
||||
* Expanded mutation-engine fuzzing
|
||||
* CI-enforced performance regression thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -350,16 +377,18 @@ Planned enhancements include:
|
||||
|
||||
ChronoSeal's testing strategy is centered on preserving deterministic behavior, cryptographic correctness, and protocol integrity.
|
||||
|
||||
The current suite of 89 tests provides broad coverage across:
|
||||
The current suite of **89 tests** provides broad coverage across:
|
||||
|
||||
* session security
|
||||
* heartbeat validation
|
||||
* mutation engine correctness
|
||||
* deterministic server/WASM parity
|
||||
* trust validation
|
||||
* storage abstraction
|
||||
* replay resistance
|
||||
* Session security
|
||||
* Heartbeat validation
|
||||
* Mutation engine correctness
|
||||
* Deterministic server/WASM parity
|
||||
* Trust validation
|
||||
* Storage abstraction
|
||||
* Replay resistance
|
||||
* Protocol hardening
|
||||
|
||||
As ChronoSeal evolves, expanding and strengthening this test suite remains a core project priority.
|
||||
Maintaining and expanding this test suite remains a core project priority as ChronoSeal evolves.
|
||||
|
||||
**Last Updated:** May 2026 (v0.6.1)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user